This Is How You Lose the Time War: an enemy worth writing to

Amal El-Mohtar & Max Gladstone

Red has won a battle and still cannot be sure she has won anything. Somewhere in the destruction she recognizes the work of Blue, an agent fighting for a rival future. This Is How You Lose the Time War makes that recognition the beginning of a romance: the person who can undo your work may also be the person who understands it.

Read this? Find your next book

StandaloneShortPace: Brisk

Editorial estimate, not an exact measurement

A victory with nobody to talk to

Red's first appearance leaves her alone among the dead. Her Agency manipulates history to secure the future that produces it; ordinary lives can become obstacles in that calculation. Yet her unease survives a successful operation. The opening gives military competence a peculiar emptiness: even overwhelming force cannot guarantee that she understands what has happened.

The attraction of the scene lies in that unsettled certainty. Red can perform extraordinary acts and still need an interpretation. Her opponent's possible intervention becomes more absorbing than the wreckage she has made. A story advertised as a romance starts with the difficulty of finding someone capable of answering you, even if their answer has so far taken the form of sabotage.

Recognizing a hand before meeting a person

Red recognizes her rival through a pattern of daring decisions. The clean sheet of paper she discovers intensifies an attention already directed towards its absent writer. Its instruction, Burn before reading, combines a challenge with practical danger. Reading could expose Red to suspicion from her own commander. Curiosity now has a cost that skill alone cannot remove.

I find this a persuasive beginning for an enemies-to-lovers story because professional admiration has something specific to attach to. Recognition comes before familiarity. The rival has noticed Red closely enough to devise a temptation for her, while Red grants that rival an individuality denied to the armies around her. The unequal distribution of attention is uncomfortable: intimacy begins amid lives treated as expendable.

The time inside a letter

In their interview with Eliot Peper, Amal El-Mohtar describes a letter as a moment of a person sent forwards to a recipient who will have changed by the time it arrives. Writing and reading take different amounts of time. A pause lasting days for the writer can disappear into a continuous sentence for the reader. That ordinary mismatch gives this extravagant premise a familiar emotional foothold.

A correspondent cannot control the person who eventually opens the message. They have to imagine that reader and commit themselves anyway. Against institutions trying to arrange the future, the authors' account makes private address feel risky in another sense: it accepts an answering mind whose response remains unwritten. The interest is in how someone might reply, as much as in how a message travels.

Writing for one particular reader

Speaking to Powder Scofield for Vector, the authors describe composing a letter and its receiving scene separately, then exchanging what they had written. They discussed the situation but kept the letter itself a surprise. This working method matters to the book's invitation: a reply can carry the pleasure of being met by something you could not have produced alone.

The same interview connects their fiction to friendships formed through early online roleplaying, when a person's language could become familiar before their face or daily circumstances. El-Mohtar links Red and Blue's affinity to finding someone who shares your interests far beyond your immediate surroundings. That helps explain why the opposing agent offers a kind of company neither woman's home can supply.

A private message leaves evidence

The opening ends with a third figure recovering the destroyed message. We do not need to identify the seeker to feel how this changes the letter's intimacy. A communication intended for one reader can acquire another. Destruction offers no easy guarantee of privacy, and the reader's privileged view arrives with the uncomfortable possibility of eavesdropping.

These pages suit someone drawn to stylized language, withheld explanations and attraction expressed through intellectual challenge. The battlefield is bloody; the prospective lovers participate in that violence. The tension between their exceptional attention to each other and their work's disregard for other lives is part of the opening's appeal and its abrasion. I want to follow the correspondence because its promised tenderness has such an uneasy starting point.

Three directions to read next

The Other Valley · Scott Alexander Howard

Scott Alexander Howard's The Other Valley also puts private attachment under institutions that regulate access to time.

What changes: Its neighbouring valleys lie twenty years apart, and a young council candidate faces rules governing visits. Choose it for grief and civic permission in a bounded community, rather than rival operatives exchanging messages across a war.

The Mimicking of Known Successes · Malka Older

Malka Older's The Mimicking of Known Successes also lets professional respect complicate a relationship between two women in a speculative setting.

What changes: Mossa and Pleiti have a shared past and a missing-person investigation on Jupiter. Their renewed proximity gives the relationship a different pressure from Red and Blue's dangerous first contact by letter.

Piranesi · Susanna Clarke

Susanna Clarke's Piranesi offers another isolated person whose world changes when messages suggest an unfamiliar presence.

What changes: The notebooks, halls and tides draw attention towards the reliability of one person's knowledge. It is a route towards solitude and mystery, rather than a romance between opponents who already recognize each other's abilities.

Questions readers ask

Is this part of either author's existing series?

No. It is their standalone collaboration. Familiarity with Gladstone's Craft Sequence or El-Mohtar's other fiction is not required.

Are Red and Blue conventional human characters?

They are presented as women and rival agents, but their bodies and abilities exceed ordinary human limits. The opening shows Red's weaponry folding into her body; the publisher's guide distinguishes the technological Agency from the organic consciousness of Garden.

Must I catch every historical or literary reference?

The authors' Vector interview says their own varied knowledge, from plants and mathematics to literature and music, entered the writing. The references can add texture without functioning as an entrance exam: the opening's immediate stakes are Red's curiosity, the letter and the danger of being discovered.

Sources and editorial approach

Direct reading covers Simon & Schuster's complete public Chapter 1 excerpt, from Red's battlefield victory to the seeker reconstructing the letter. We have not read the full novella. Direct author interviews with Eliot Peper and Vector supply the discussion of correspondence and collaboration; the publisher's premise and guide supply the wider setup. Interpretations and comparisons are FolioRoam's; the linked publishers support the comparison premises.

Find reader reviews

See other readers’ perspectives. Reviews on external sites may cover other editions.

External site; content may be in English.

Search Goodreads for reader reviews